The worst medical errors that can happen to us. Medical malpractice

Victims of medical errors, of which there are more in the world than it seems, most often do not know how to defend their innocence and achieve an adequate punishment for the person in the gown, who not only failed expectations, but also demonstrated dishonesty, self-confidence or ignorance.

The punishment for “medical error” as such is not defined by law; there are several articles of the criminal code on this subject. But it’s not so easy to bring to justice a doctor who ruined someone’s life. At a minimum, independent expertise and persistent patience are required.

Fear of visiting a doctor's office is a completely healthy phenomenon. It is worse if this fear is well founded, when patients know from the media about the terrible mistakes that occur in hospitals around the world - even in developed countries With the best devices and high incomes for doctors. Many people have heard stories about medical instruments forgotten by specialists in the bodies of patients. Every year, similar embarrassments and even misfortunes happen to tens of thousands of inhabitants of the Earth who have had the misfortune of ending up in a hospital of any level. There are other medical errors in surgery and beyond, leading to disability or death of a patient who falls into the hands of an errant specialist.

Approximately every third medical error causes complications for the patient’s health and well-being. In addition, in Russia at least two patients die every day due to such errors, and some social activists claim that up to 50 thousand a year (in America - up to 250 thousand, if that).

Such cases could be described as comical if they were fixable. Not a single decent hospital wants to spoil its reputation with operations performed at the wrong address. However, even with strict control and protocols here and there, surgeons make mistakes that should never happen. For example, in one of the US clinics, biopsy samples were once mixed up in the laboratory prostate gland, and, therefore, a sick client with a healthy one. As a result, the patient, who lived without any hint of cancer, had his entire healthy prostate removed by surgeons. This is a complex and responsible procedure. Meanwhile, the real cancer patient was sent home, unaware of his true diagnosis.

In another overseas case, a patient died from pathological process in the lung after an intern inserted a breathing tube into the wrong place in a seriously ill patient.

Errors in patient selection make up, according to a number of studies, up to 0.5% of all medical errors in question.

Among the most horrifying examples of patient “switching” is the story of 41-year-old Colleen Burns, who suffered a head injury in a fall and woke up on operating table a minute before... seizure internal organs, started by surgeons. The fanatics involuntarily not only confused the sick, but also confused a living person with sedatives with a lifeless body. Fortunately, the operation was stopped in time, and the doctors remembered the curious incident for the rest of their lives. It happened in 2009 in New York state. The doctors were fined $22,000 for dangerous negligence, but could not explain why this happened. Well, after 11 months, Mrs. Burns still committed suicide by swallowing pills, despite her three daughters.

Errors during blood transfusion

It is believed that every tenth surgery in a hospital setting is accompanied by blood transfusions, of which millions are performed annually. The procedure seems to be routine, but there is also room for medical mistakes, and very dangerous ones at that.

According to statistics, out of 10 thousand packages of donated blood, at least one will contain blood that is not the one indicated on the label. Many tens of thousands of transfusion errors occur every year, with every 500th patient dying. Blood may be incorrectly signed during collection, samples may be mixed up in the laboratory, data may be entered incorrectly into the computer, etc. It also happens immune system the patient refuses to accept foreign blood components or.

In 2013, in St. Petersburg, Russia, a one-year-old girl, tasting everything, swallowed 6 magnets from an “educational” toy, so the little one needed emergency surgery, during which the patient’s condition became very serious. Due to anemia, the girl was urgently transfused with red blood cells from... an HIV-positive donor, dooming the child to long and expensive treatment. It turned out that the head of the department received a message that the blood was contagious, but he initially ignored it. By the time the error was discovered, the child had been given 50 ml of dangerous liquid. A similar high-profile case with viruses in donor blood occurred in 2006 in Kostroma. The reason is carelessness.

Air embolism

Atmospheric air, without which a person cannot live, becomes a cause of death in a hospital environment if it enters the bloodstream. In this case, venous air embolismspecial case gas embolism. Emboli are defined as gas bubbles that can block the work of circulatory system. IN modern surgery Air embolism is a rare phenomenon, but it occurs more often than we would like. Gas embolism of the blood causes pulmonary embolism, when the vessels of the lungs suffer from air “plugs”. Death from pulmonary embolism is one of the leading preventable hospital deaths.

The mortality rate from air bubbles entering a patient's vein through a catheter reaches 30 percent. Even those who survive often remain disabled for life. Consequences include permanent brain damage. What is especially frightening is that air embolism can occur during routine surgical procedures, making them deadly. For example, during dental prosthetics. In 1987, a certain dentist, while “doing teeth” on clients, managed to let air into the blood of five of them. Three victims, turning blue, died right in the office from heart attack. The problem turned out to be the hollow drill of the drill, which supplied the patients’ bloodstream with a mixture of water and air. The clients had little time to feel anything, because they were under anesthesia - general or local.

Incorrect surgical operations

It happens that victims medical errors go to court, bringing would-be doctors to justice. In 25%, it concerns cases where patients undergo operations that are not indicated for them. Even in America, the number of such claims exceeds a hundred per year, and if the problem is successfully resolved, the compensation received by the plaintiff averages 232 thousand dollars (reaching 7 million).

Despite all the procedures designed to eliminate gross mistakes by surgeons, incorrect operations happen more often than one might think. For example, one woman had her fallopian tube removed instead of her appendix, and another patient had heart surgery that he did not need at all. One of the most terrible cases occurred in 2011, when a 32-year-old resident of England, who was carrying fourth child and suffered from appendicitis, the right ovary was removed instead of the appendix. The operation was performed by a young surgeon of Pakistani origin, and his senior colleague and mentor chose to go home (early). The inflamed appendix did not go away; after 3 weeks the woman was again admitted to the hospital with abdominal pain. It was then that doctors from Romford learned about the mistake of the inexperienced doctor. Four days later, the patient gave birth to a still premature baby; her appendix was removed, but then she died on the operating table from multiple organ failure, which resulted from blood poisoning.

Wrong medications or incorrect dosage

People tend to believe that the medicine their doctor prescribes is the medicine they need. the right dosage. Yet millions of people are given incorrect prescriptions every day. Let's say that Americans annually purchase more than three billion recipes, of which 51.5 million contain errors. That is, if a pharmacy processes 250 medical orders per day, then four of them will be incorrect. This phenomenon is doubly dangerous. Firstly, the patient can receive harmful remedy, unnecessary to him; secondly, he will not get what he really needs.

Mistakes with prescription drugs occur in both pharmacies and clinics. One day, a nurse accidentally poisoned a pair of twins who were born prematurely - at 27 weeks of pregnancy - with morphine. The boys were injected with lethal doses of the drug - 650-800 micrograms, when only 50-100 micrograms were supposed to be injected. The disaster happened in 2010.

In another case, a 79-year-old pensioner on dialysis was given pancuronium bromide instead of an antacid. Pancuronium is a paralyzing agent used to complex operations or lethal injections, but my grandfather needed an antacid for heartburn. The nurse mixed up the packaging. After 30 minutes, the patient became unresponsive and died from cardiac arrest.

In 2009, in Kazakhstan, an 85-year-old patient who suffered a myocardial infarction nurse introduced heart drug korglykon in a dose ten times higher than prescribed by the doctor. She allegedly imagined that the ampoules indicated a lower dosage. The old woman began to suffer and by the time the ambulance arrived she was already dead. The health worker, who made a fatal mistake, resigned from the clinic of her own free will - with a diploma and a “clean” work record.

Hospital infections and dirty medical equipment

Usually people go to the hospital to get rid of illnesses, not suspecting that hospitals themselves are a source of illnesses and infections. They are hidden in unsterile instruments and devices, on the unwashed hands of staff. So, rare disease Creutzfeldt-Jakob, fraught with brain destruction (“ mad cow disease") in 2012-2014 was transferred to dozens of patients of American neurosurgeons. The reason is insufficient sterilization of surgical instruments used in the treatment of carriers of a dangerous disease.

Statistics say that every 25th hospital patient becomes a victim of a hospital infection. Hundreds of thousands of people die from such diseases every year. Having been in a hospital bed, they run the risk of acquiring pneumonia first, followed in the list by inflammation of the urethra and infectious diseases digestive system, primary infections circulatory system (from dirty catheters).


The manifestations of diseases are so diverse and dissimilar that the most attentive and conscientious attitude sometimes leads to an incorrect diagnosis. Therefore, when making a decision, the court will take into account whether the specialist has taken all possible and available measures to prevent negative consequences. So, if the doctor carried out the necessary diagnostic measures, which should have shown the problem, but did not, then the likelihood of being held accountable for an erroneous diagnosis is minimal. In this case, the doctor most likely did everything in his power, and unless the contrary is proven, he will not be held legally responsible for an incorrect diagnosis.

Medical error

Attention

Considering that the damaged eye needed to be removed, he mistakenly removed the boy’s absolutely healthy organ. We can only guess what kind of punishment doctors suffered for their mistakes more than a hundred years ago.


9. Radiation and treatment An even greater misfortune befell the patient suffering from tongue cancer. Jerome Parks - that was the patient's name - was mistakenly receiving radiation aimed at others for several days. healthy organs, in particular on the brain.

The consequence of this was the complete loss of hearing and vision of the patient. The unbearable torment of the unfortunate man was alleviated only by death.

10. Disinfected patient Also, the mistake of nurse Virginia Mason ended in a fatal outcome. She, having inattentively read the inscription on the package, gave the patient an injection of a disinfectant solution.
Mary McClinton, 69, did not survive such negligence. 11.

Medical errors and liability for them

Info

Path: → Lectures (continued) →→ Medical errors An unfavorable treatment outcome associated with a doctor’s honest mistake is usually referred to as medical errors. The term “medical error” is used only in medical practice.


The variety of medical errors, their causes and conditions of occurrence has led to the fact that until now there is no single concept of medical error, which naturally complicates the medical and legal assessment of erroneous actions of medical workers. The main criterion for medical error is the doctor’s conscientious error arising from certain objective conditions without elements of negligence, negligence and professional ignorance.

The concept and statistics of medical errors in Russia First of all, the victim should understand that the law will be on his side, since a medical error is criminal offense. However, it has a number of features, many of which you need to know:

  • Since this error often occurs accidentally and involves an act without bad intentions, the responsibility on the part of the doctor is mitigated.

    In order for the punishment to be serious, it will be necessary to prove that the error was malicious.

  • The objective causes of medical error are negligence, inattention and lack of experience. They are taken into account to reduce the sentence.
  • Subjective causes of medical error are negligence during examination and medical procedures, neglect of modern medical supplies etc.

What is medical error (concept and examples)?

Therefore, solving the problem at the legal level is very difficult. And yet, expert conclusions about the presence of a medical error (and it is better to appoint such an examination away from the region of the incident) can fail a particular person. medical worker under one or another criminal article.

Important

Then a court decision will probably follow on the ban on practicing medicine in certain period. And for the death of a patient, doctors can even be sentenced to imprisonment.

And even if no crime is found in the doctor’s actions based on the results of the investigation or trial, he may be subject to disciplinary liability. Bail does not always work and not everywhere. Somewhere, the administration of a hospital or clinic can independently punish an employee.

Compensation to a patient for harm resulting from a medical error Obviously, the consequences of a medical error can vary, and significantly.

Examples of medical errors

Part 3 of Art. is being considered. 123 CC.

  • The patient contracted HIV infection due to the negligence of the doctor. Part 4 art. 122 of the Criminal Code provides for imprisonment for up to 5 years.
  • If, as a result of illegally carried out medical or pharmaceutical activities, the patient suffered serious harm to health, the perpetrator is punishable by Part 1.

    1 tbsp. 235 CC. Fatal cases are considered under Part 2 of Art. 235 CC.

  • If the patient was not provided with assistance, as a result of which he received harm of moderate or mild severity, the punishment is established by Art. 124 CC. If the harm is more significant or irreparable, then Part 2 of Art. 124 CC.
  • If the fact of medical negligence is established, the result of which is the infliction of serious harm to human health or the death of the patient, then Part 2 of Art.

What is medical negligence, how to define it and bring criminals to justice?

Therefore, he has the right to present the amount he needs, but within reasonable limits.

  • Criminal liability. It is established for harm caused to life and death due to medical error.


    In the event that the patient receives poor quality medical care, but no significant harm was caused to his health, criminal liability is impossible. A forensic examination is carried out to determine the extent of the damage.

Often, victims have to make certain efforts to receive moral harm, because usually doctors do not agree to admit the fact of a mistake and prove their own innocence by all means.

13 creepy examples of medical negligence

Subjective reasons are used in legal practice to aggravate a sentence. According to a statement by a representative of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, latest statistics according to medical errors it looks like this:

  • In 2015, 712 people, including 317 children, suffered from medical errors and poor quality services medical care.
  • In 2016, 352 patients died as a result of medical errors, of which 142 were children. At the same time, the Investigative Committee received more than 2,500 reports of crimes related to medical negligence.

    Based on them, more than 400 criminal cases were opened.

To date, there is no precise definition of medical error. That is why during the proceedings the situation is quite difficult, because it is necessary to prove the fact of a medical error.

Medical errors: the “dark” side of medicine

“Medical error” refers to the actions or inaction of a doctor that led to a deterioration in the patient’s condition, and in the most tragic cases, to his death. It is often difficult to prove that a medical error occurred (this is due to the incompetence of interested parties, criminal corporate solidarity, and other factors), but nevertheless, citizens have such an opportunity at the legal level.

The child looked bad, was lethargic, drowsy, ate without appetite, and coughed. On January 29, 1998, at 1 p.m., Klava B., along with other children, was put to bed in the bedroom. The child slept peacefully and did not cry. When the children got up at 3 p.m., Klava B. showed no signs of life, but was still warm.

The nursery's older nurse immediately began performing artificial respiration on her, gave her two injections of caffeine, and the child's body was warmed up with heating pads. The arriving emergency doctor performed mouth-to-mouth artificial respiration and chest compressions.

However, it was not possible to revive the child. During a forensic medical examination of Klava B.’s corpse, the following were discovered: catarrhal bronchitis, common serous-catarrhal pneumonia, interstitial pneumonia, multiple foci of hemorrhages into the lung tissue, which was the cause of the child’s death.

This article will discuss insurance issues, liability and punishment for medical errors. It is shown which article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is provided for, i.e. What is the criminal liability for medical error?

Statistics and examples of medical errors are given. Recommended where to go and how to avoid medical errors. Examples are given from life during childbirth, dentistry, and surgery. How to prove a doctor's negligence.

Quite often, medical errors in Russia lead to serious and sometimes irreversible consequences. In judicial practice, the attitude towards such cases is ambiguous, and it is sometimes not possible to prove the fact of a medical error. The reasons, types and examples of doctors’ errors are very diverse, and unfortunately, the annual statistics of medical errors are not encouraging and each of us can face this problem.

As you know, “Forewarned is forearmed,” so we recommend that you carefully read this article in order to have an idea in what cases you can achieve the truth and hold doctors accountable for the medical errors they have made.

General information: causes, examples and types of medical errors

A medical or medical error is a non-malicious error of a medical worker (doctor) in the process of carrying out his professional activities in the case where dishonest performance of his duties, as well as negligent attitude towards them, are excluded.

Every person has the right to medical care. This fact enshrined in the Constitution Russian Federation(Part 1, Article 41 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation).

The most important principle of health care in our country is the quality and availability of medical care.

High-quality medical care can only be called if it meets the following requirements:

1) Timely delivery.

2) The correct choice of preventive methods.

3) Correct choice of diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation.

4) Achieving the result that was planned.
The above requirements are reflected in paragraph 21 of Article 2 of the Law “On the Fundamentals of the Protection of Citizens”.

Nevertheless, quite often we have to deal with medical errors that arise due to various circumstances. The consequence of such medical errors is harm to the health and life of citizens.

A medical or medical error can be encountered both at the stage of diagnosis and during treatment or even surgical intervention.

Most common reasons medical errors are as follows:

1) Uncoordinated actions of doctors. Especially if the patient is being treated by several doctors.

2) Improper handling of medical equipment.

3) Disregard for established sanitary standards.

4) Inattentive assignment medicines. For example, if they were prescribed in the wrong dosage or do not correspond to the diagnosis.

Criminal liability for medical error, article of doctor's fault

The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not provide for a special crime in relation to medical error. Actions, as well as inaction of a doctor, as a result of which he may be brought to criminal liability are described in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Note: A medical malpractice lawyer can advise you. The form for contacting him is given at the end of the article.

In this case, the following conditions must be met:

  1. Illegal behavior of a doctor.
  2. Causing serious harm to health or death.
  3. The presence of a cause-and-effect relationship between harm and the doctor’s unlawful behavior.
  4. The doctor's fault.

At first glance, it may seem that bringing a doctor to criminal liability in the presence of the conditions described above is not difficult. But in reality, everything is not so simple. It is often quite difficult, and sometimes simply impossible, to prove the fact that illegal actions or inaction of a doctor took place.

Unlawful actions are those that violate established by law norms regulating medical activities. Violations of customs and rules are also considered illegal in the medical field. medical practice in the process of carrying out a complex of therapeutic, diagnostic and preventive measures. Moreover, they can exist not only in written form, but also in unwritten traditions medical activities.

It is worth noting that the treatment process for each individual patient differs from all previous ones, even with a single diagnosis. In other words, the methodology for carrying out procedures (diagnostic and therapeutic), the treatment regimen and prescription of drugs, as well as monitoring the patient’s health status may be different in each individual case.

Simply put, if three patients are given the same diagnosis, but the first one has allergic reaction for some medical supplies, the second one has concomitant diseases, and the third is in old age, then individual treatment will be prescribed for each of them, taking into account all associated factors.

As a result of the situations described above, it is often not possible objective assessment illegality of a doctor’s actions in relation to a specific patient. The thing is that there are different approaches to treating the same disease.

It is also not easy to prove that the patient was harmed as a result of the doctor’s negligent behavior. This is explained by the fact that what is subject to punishment is not the fact that the doctor did not cure the patient, but the fact that in the process of treatment he significantly deviated from generally accepted norms, which led to a deterioration in the patient’s condition.

In case of a medical (medical) error, the doctor’s fault can exist solely in the form of negligence (negligence or frivolity).

A medical professional’s mistake in the form of frivolity occurs when he foresaw the possibility of undesirable consequences, but groundlessly hoped that it was in his power and competence to prevent them. In other words, he understood that his actions or inaction could harm the patient, but he thought that he could cope with the situation that arose, and in the end he did not have enough experience and knowledge.

Malpractice in the form of negligence occurs when a physician does not foresee the possibility of undesirable consequences as a result of his actions or inactions. Although if he had been more attentive and prudent to this situation, then such consequences could have been avoided.

Essentially, negligence is a significant discrepancy with generally accepted norms of action by medical workers with identical and similar education and experience, which led to harm to the health of the patient.

We also note that criminal liability in the event of a medical error is provided only in cases where the patient’s health has been seriously harmed. If the patient received medical care of inadequate quality and as a result his health was damaged minor harm(light and moderate severity), then the guilty doctor will not be held criminally liable. The severity of the harm is determined during the investigation based on the results of a forensic medical examination.

This mandatory conditions conducting an investigation. After all, it is in the process of conducting a forensic medical examination of medical errors that it will be determined to what extent the nature of the treatment in relation to the patient complied with the standards. For example, if a doctor made a mistake during a surgical procedure, then the court will hear the opinion of an independent expert doctor regarding how and under what conditions this operation was performed.

Thus, resolving disputes regarding the medical cases described above is often quite difficult. This can be explained by the fact that each individual case is unique in its content, and it is not possible to reflect all standards at the legislative level.

As mentioned above, the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not provide for a separate crime for committing a medical error. If as a result of unlawful actions or inaction medical personnel If severe harm to the patient’s health was caused or death occurred, then criminal liability arises for certain elements of the crime that are provided for in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Russia. The conditions under which this is possible were described above.

According to Part 2 of Article 109 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, a medical error that led to the death of a patient can be punishable by imprisonment for up to three years with or without deprivation of the right to engage in medical activities for the same period.

If the patient’s health was seriously harmed as a result of improper performance of the doctor’s duties, then this doctor may be held criminally liable in the form of imprisonment for up to one year with or without deprivation of the right to engage in medical activities for the same period.

In addition to the above-mentioned crimes, there are the following types of medical errors that are subject to criminal punishment:

1) Illegal abortion as a result of which the death of the patient occurred or serious harm was caused to her health. (Part 3 of Article 123 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

2) Infection of a patient with HIV infection as a result of improper performance of professional medical duties. (Part 4 of Article 122 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). A sentence of up to 5 years in prison is provided.

3) Engagement in private pharmaceutical activities or medical practice without a license for these types of activities in the case where this led to harm to health as a result of negligence. (Part 1 of Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). If these types of activities led to the death of the patient, then the perpetrators will be punished in accordance with Part 2 of Article 235 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

4) Not helping the patient(Article 124 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). In this case, it is enough to cause moderate harm to the patient’s health as a result of negligence. If, as a result of the doctor’s negligence, serious harm was caused to the patient’s health or even death occurs, then the doctor’s act will be considered a qualified one (Part 2 of Article 124 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

5) Negligence. It represents improper performance or complete failure to perform his duties by an official as a result of a careless and dishonest attitude towards his work. If the doctor’s negligence led to serious harm to health or death of the patient as a result of negligence, then it will be qualified in accordance with Part 2 of Article 293 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Let us note that after a criminal case has been initiated and before the judicial investigation, the victim has the right to file a civil claim and demand compensation for property damage that was caused by the crime, as well as compensation for moral damage. These rights are noted in Article 44 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

If the patient does not exercise this right, then after the verdict against the doctor is passed, claims for compensation for harm and compensation for moral damage can be filed in civil proceedings. According to Part 2 of Article 306 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, if the doctor’s guilt is not recognized, the court will refuse to satisfy the civil claim.

Medical risk

According to Article 41 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, justified medical risk can exclude criminal liability.

But in order to this risk was declared lawful, the following conditions must be met:

1) Medical risk should be aimed at preserving the health and life of the patient.

2) The goal specified in the previous paragraph cannot be achieved by other means that do not involve risk. If there is an alternative treatment method that is less risky or does not involve risk at all, then the doctor should give preference to it.

3) The doctor is obliged to take measures sufficient from a professional point of view in order to prevent possible harm as much as possible.

If harm to the patient’s health was caused within the framework of the conditions described above, then no crime will be found in the doctor’s actions. If these conditions were not met and, as a result, harm was caused to the health and life of the patient, then if the doctor is guilty, it will be possible to prosecute him criminally.

Nobody keeps official statistics on medical errors. According to calculations public organizations, medical errors claim the lives of 50 thousand people every year. According to the Center for Independent Medical and Legal Expertise, dentists take first place in professional errors. The death or injury of a woman in labor or a newborn in a maternity hospital is in second place. Third place is occupied by surgeons of all specialties.

So we've covered some very important questions.

Medical malpractice in Russia. Judicial practice, types, classification, definition, concept, consequences and causes of medical error

Last year, about 200 forensic medical examinations were carried out in medical cases in Belarus. Most often, they were based on claims and accusations against doctors.

Statistics, albeit partial, confirm that harm to life and health as a result of a medical error is a fairly common phenomenon. But neither in Belarus nor among our neighbors will anyone tell you exactly how many people became disabled or died as a result of the wrong actions of doctors. But, for example, the United States is aware of its medical tragedies: in the hospitals of this country, from 44 thousand to 98 thousand people die every year due to medical errors, writes the newspaper Respublika.
But is everything as simple as it seems from the outside?

Plugs, plugs and life

Patient L. underwent a planned endoscopy in one of the clinics in Bobruisk. The endoscope tube did not pass beyond the middle third of the esophagus due to some obstruction that the doctor could not see. He tried to overcome it blindly, by force, but he failed. The doctor interrupted the study and sent the patient on his own to the oncology clinic.

The woman came there five hours after the endoscopy. The dispensary specialists diagnosed damage to the inflammatory esophagus, trachea and inflammation of the mediastinal organs. Despite urgent treatment and hospitalization, the patient died.

Later, the forensic medical report will indicate a gross medical error by the endoscopist: he did not examine the patient before the examination, during endoscopy he did not empty the esophagus carefully enough, and so on.

Patient L. approached an ENT doctor at one of the clinics in Minsk with complaints of a sore throat when swallowing, saying that he had “got something in his throat.” fish bone during meals the day before." The doctor examined the patient, but did not find a foreign body and sent the patient home.

After that, the man went to different hospitals, he was given different diagnoses, and his death on the 20th day after the first treatment was provoked by that same undetected fish bone. The forensic medical examination noted that at all stages, in violation of protocols, the patient’s esophagus was not examined or diagnosed there foreign body, which ultimately led to tragedy.

The details of these and many other stories became known thanks to the work of forensic expert commissions. These examples are gross defects in the quality of medical care. Perhaps I would like to console and say that such cases are quite rare, but this would not be true. Because from 2002 to 2010, 996 such gross defects were recorded during 822 forensic medical examinations.

The sad arithmetic is this: over eight years, 353 times doctors made an incorrect or inaccurate diagnosis, 247 times they grossly violated clinical protocols diagnosis and treatment, performed complex examinations tactically and technically incorrectly 59 times and surgical interventions. Violations during obstetrics were identified in 31 cases and 7 times surgeons left foreign bodies in the cavities of the patients’ bodies.

Over the years, our service employees have completed 1,298 forensic medical examinations,” says Yuri Gusakov, chief state forensic expert of the Republic of Belarus. “And each time they were based on claims and accusations against doctors. Based on materials from criminal cases, examinations were carried out 174 times. In general, over the past decade, from year to year there has been a steady increase in the number of examinations in so-called medical cases: from 68 in 2000 to 199 in the past.

With a check to a medical facility where something strange is happening, employees Civil service medical forensic examinations of the Republic of Belarus can come independently, having previously notified the Ministry of Health. And every time there are quite good reasons for this. Sometimes surprising facts come to light.

The cardiology department of one of the hospitals in the Minsk region, by the way, is well equipped,” recalls Yuri Gusakov. “There, one after another, people who were urgently delivered with heart fibrillation began to die. A well-known device called a defibrillator successfully removes a person from this state. One person died, the other... "Is there a defibrillator?" - we ask. “Yes,” they say. And there are some great new defibrillators that are really worth it. "When were they purchased?" - “Two years ago.” - “Why don’t you use it?” - “Their plug doesn’t fit our sockets.” A fork costs three rubles, and millions have been invested in the hospital.

Guilty. In frivolity

The fates of doctors and heads of medical institutions whose work is defective can turn out differently. And they may be subject to different responsibilities: from disciplinary measures to administrative sanctions and criminal penalties. Although, as Alexey Kralko, a specialist in the field of medicine and law, teacher of the Belarusian medical academy postgraduate education, there are much fewer criminal cases of medical errors than civil ones.

If we analyze the review of judicial practice, there are enough claims from patients, but in most cases they end in favor of the defendant. Why? Imperfection of mechanisms of work in the medical legal field. After all, even the term “medical error” itself is quite controversial.

At one time, Academician Davydovsky called this the conscientious delusion of a doctor, which is based on the imperfection of medical science itself and its methods, the non-standard course of the disease or the lack of preparedness of the doctor. But under one condition: if no elements of dishonesty, negligence, or frivolity are detected. That is, a medical error is, by and large, the innocent actions of a doctor. But intentionally causing harm is not a mistake, it becomes a crime. That is why jurisprudence does not use the term “medical error” in practice - it is not even defined by regulatory documents. This concept is more appropriate among doctors themselves to reflect the objective incorrectness of the actions of colleagues.

From a legal point of view, the so-called medical error has all the signs of an offense and it can always be seen as careless guilt in the form of frivolity or negligence. In this case, an unfavorable treatment outcome occurs due to subjective reasons. And the same result, but due to objective reasons, is classified by lawyers as accidents that do not depend in any way on the will of the doctor.

For example, a person was hospitalized too late in in serious condition or his rare disease, or a disease with unexpressed symptoms, or there is no possibility of special research in the hospital, or, in general, there is little information in medical science about the essence and mechanism of the pathological process. But to be honest, most offenses in medicine are committed due to negligence.

The concept of medical error can be considered in several aspects. On the one hand, even the most conscientious specialist, who is responsible for his reputation and in no way wants to harm the patient, can make mistakes.

However, some doctors perform their functions poorly and show negligence and indifference to the patient. IN best case scenario this will not affect the patient in any way; at worst, it will lead to deterioration in health, or even death due to medical error. It is in such situations that the relatives of the victim wonder what responsibility the doctor bears, whether a medical error can be classified under an article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

The definition of a medical error comes down to the fact that it is an unintentional or indirectly intended criminal act of a physician in relation to a patient.

Any crime entails criminal liability, therefore, in this case, criminal law clearly protects the interests of the injured party.

The question is how serious the punishment will be, and here it is necessary to understand the following points:

  1. This crime in itself does not imply an intentional illegal act, so the sanction for careless behavior will be far from maximum. In order to punish the attacker in a big way, you will have to look for factual evidence of intent to cause harm.
  2. There are also mitigating circumstances that the judge takes into account when sentencing. This is careless behavior or lack of practice and experience. These circumstances characterize the objective side of the offense.
  3. At the same time, the subjective side is expressed in the criminal’s attitude towards his actions. Thus, negligence in the performance of duties means that a person understands the meaning of his actions, does not fully devote himself to work, may lead to negative consequences, and still acts in this way due to negligence. Of course, such circumstances are taken into account when deciding the fate of the offender and aggravate the situation of the defendant.

According to judicial practice, medical omissions occur about 700 times a year. Slightly less than half of the cases of poor-quality medical care concern the treatment of minors. The country's Investigative Committee recorded about 350 fatal cases, 150 of which involved children.

As you know, the state has compulsory health insurance (CHI). If you have a policy, a citizen can contact the insurance company with an application or complaint against a medical institution or a specific specialist. The latter, in turn, conducts its own investigation and engages the competent authorities to prevent further violations and punish the perpetrators. So statistics show that every year insurance companies receive about 2,500 complaints that the activities of doctors have signs of negligence and criminal features.

The concept of medical error has not been established legally. The main thing is that proving the fact of an offense falls on the shoulders of the victim, who must present maximum evidence to confirm this circumstance.

Depending on at what point in the treatment the error occurred, there are several types of mistakes by doctors.

So, the classification of medical errors is:

  1. The most common errors occur in practice when diagnosing clients.
  2. Which appear when insufficient provision health workers with equipment or medicines. This also includes the uncoordinated and disorganized work of medical staff.
  3. After establishing an incorrect disease, the doctor automatically prescribes incorrect treatment (in the form of medications taken, method of taking medications, etc. health treatments). As a result, one error is superimposed on the second, which leads to unpredictable results.
  4. The doctor's next omission is psychological character, and concerns the choice of the wrong tactics of behavior when communicating with the patient or his family members.
  5. Often, with a large flow of documents, health workers record information about one person in the medical records of another: they confuse tests, medical histories, etc.
  6. The last category concerns pharmaceutical errors, when a specialist incorrectly compared the effect of a drug with the client’s diagnosis or dispensed medications that are incompatible with each other.

Of course, these mistakes have completely different subjective and objective side, therefore, will be assessed taking into account the details of the act. Equally important when choosing the type of criminal liability of the offender will be the damage caused by the error of the healthcare employee.

Dentist services most often cost the client a large sum, regardless of whether private clinic provides treatment or government. Of course, the price tags in paid medical institutions are higher, but the cost of the service will not insure against mistakes.

Claims against representatives of the dental medical industry vary depending on the object and subject of the appeal.

Thus, dishonesty may be on the part of a visitor who, through the court, tries to accuse the doctor of lack of qualifications and return the amount of an expensive procedure. In turn, some specialists have the habit of performing services poorly, thereby securing work for themselves in the future so that the client will come again.

The latter case is almost impossible to prove, and it hardly amounts to a criminal offense. But in the first situation, statistics are observed that a third of cases involving accusations against dentists remain without a solution satisfactory to the plaintiff due to lack of grounds.

However, the rest (and most) of the cases still confirm the fact that dentists make mistakes in practice.

In general, medical mistakes dental office boil down to this:

  • incorrect diagnosis of dental disease or oral cavity;
  • poor choice of pain reliever;
  • treating the wrong tooth, etc.

In order to minimize the risks of a client going to court, the doctor should carefully study the disease, clearly explain to the patient what the problem is, propose a treatment concept, coordinate and clarify all the nuances. If the patient needs thorough treatment, an agreement can be concluded with him, which spells out the conditions of treatment and gives the patient’s consent to carry it out.

The types of medical errors also affect the punishment of the employee. If errors in the work of a physician are identified within the work team, then disciplinary sanctions are applied to him in the form of a decrease in the level of skill, a reprimand. The perpetrator may also be sent to advanced training classes. The doctor may be demoted or even fired.

If the defect was noticed by patients and they came to complain about the doctor, then one of these types of liability may await him:

  1. In accordance with civil law. This type liability is considered as part of a civil claim for damages. This often includes a moral damages clause. The victim chooses an amount that, in his opinion, would cover the costs of restoring health and mental suffering. Of course, the cost of the specified damage must be confirmed by evidence in the form of checks and receipts for payment for medicines and health procedures.
  2. Sanctions provided for by criminal law. Apply if negligence caused harm to human life or health. Also, if the consequence of the defect was the death of the unfortunate person. The patient must understand that the irresponsibility, inaction and carelessness of the doctor is assessed as a crime only if the harm caused turns out to be significant. In order to determine how much the patient’s health has suffered, an examination is carried out to identify medical indicators.

Separately, you need to think through the tactics of proving that a person has suffered morally. In general, the evidence base must be strong, since, most likely, the doctor will deny everything and not admit guilt.

So, if a medical error occurs, there is no article that should be applied. Criminal law provides for certain offenses under which a physician may be punished for causing adverse consequences in a patient due to wrong actions medical staff.

So, if the judge determined based on the results medical analysis that appearance fatal outcome directly related to the actions of a resuscitator, gynecologist or other specialist, the employee will face punishment under Part 2 of Art. 109 of the Criminal Code. According to the disposition of this norm, a sanction is applied in case of careless actions of an official that resulted in death.

Punishment may be in the form of restriction or deprivation of will for up to three years. It is possible to be held less liable if the claim concerns adverse consequences in the form of serious danger and serious harm to health. For such an offense, the perpetrator is punishable by up to 1 year in prison (Article 118 of the Criminal Code). Along with these sanctions, the doctor may be deprived of the right to work in the medical field.

  1. Process in obstetrics and gynecology, if the legal process for performing an abortion was not followed or other cases when the patient was injured in the gynecological office, Art. 123 CC.
  2. If the health worker did not comply with safety measures and his actions caused the person who applied to become infected with HIV infection. Punishment occurs in accordance with part four of Art. 122 of the Criminal Code and consists of imprisoning the perpetrator for 5 years.
  3. If clinical measures, which were undertaken by a doctor or pharmaceutical employee and led to moderate or severe negative consequences for human health, then they are punishable under the first part of Art. 235. Under part two, the same acts are qualified if they caused death.
  4. Art. 124 implies punishment for refusal to provide assistance by an employee who should and could have provided it. Here there is also a difference between parts one and two in terms of consequences from moderate harm to death.
  5. The law separately spells out Article 293 of the Criminal Code, which establishes liability for the negligence of medical personnel. To be punished, persons under this article must severe consequences for health or death.

The classification of offenses depends on the specific elements of the crime: objective and subjective side. That is why the legislator did not leave a single legal concept and rules stipulating responsibility for misconduct in treatment and prevention.

Along with a claim for a crime, the injured party has the right to file an application in which to demand that the defendant be forced to pay monetary compensation.

Where can you go and complain if what the doctor does goes beyond the boundaries of what is acceptable and harms clients:

  1. To the management team of a medical institution. Even if medical clinic paid, it must have an employee who is responsible for his subordinates. In public hospitals this is the head structural unit organization or chief physician. The victim must write a statement or come to a personal appointment, explain the situation in detail, provide evidence of the doctor’s erroneous actions and show the result of the mistake. The head physician or manager analyzes the application and takes disciplinary actions: making a decision to deprive a subordinate of monetary remuneration, reprimanding, imposing penalties, raising the issue of reducing qualifications.
  2. To the insurance company where the citizen received health insurance. A detailed statement is written here and evidence is included. Based on the facts submitted insurance company conducts an investigation, and if there is no fact of slander, the organization will face a fine.
  3. To the court. To begin legal proceedings, you will need to draw up statement of claim indicating the circumstances, justifying the legal requirements from a legal point of view. Based on the testimony and evidence of the parties, the judge will decide whether the defendant should pay compensation and determine its amount.
  4. To the prosecutor's office. The appeal to this authority must be based on the fact that the defendant is accused of a crime. Here the complainant needs to be careful as he will have to go through an unpleasant conversation if the allegations turn out to be untrue.

The function of supervision over the activities of medical organizations is also performed by the Ministry of Health and Roszdravnadzor, to which a citizen has the right to file a complaint.

When choosing a competent authority, a person should focus on the relationship between the violation and the consequences caused. Of course, for any charges, the person must have sufficient evidence of the offense and cause-and-effect relationships.

What is included in the evidence base

It is necessary to begin the explanation with the fact that the patient was treated in the clinic by a specific specialist.

Identification of the fact of the state in a relationship can be carried out on the basis of the following documents:

  • documentation about the patient from the medical record;
  • papers with survey results;
  • payment documents confirming the fact of payment for the services of the medical institution;
  • pharmacy receipts for the purchase of medications;
  • written prescriptions, etc.

Witness testimony may be used to support the victim's accusations. If a person decides to complain, he should take care of copies of the above papers; lawyers recommend keeping the originals.

Judicial practice

Medical errors examples from life:

  1. Doctors' mistakes also happen in pediatrics; one of the cases caused the death of a little girl, which was caused by severe illness lungs. There was no pneumonia clear symptoms, so the doctor considered the baby healthy. The pediatrician discharged a sick child whose body could not withstand the overload in kindergarten.
  2. Another patient suffered after the operation. The medical staff violated technical standards, and a wound appeared, which became a source of infection, due to which the patient died.
  3. In the field of pathology, about 21% of cases of incorrect examination results were found.
  4. Citizens note that medical examinations in hospitals are carried out fictitiously. There are cases when a baby dies or becomes disabled when obstetricians pull him out of the birth canal.

Based on the reports of police officers and experts, it can be concluded that such consequences are caused by a lack of practice and knowledge among employees. For prevention and warning similar situations employees should include professional development classes in their schedule and spend time on self-development.