How do mtsko results affect the final grade? Why are mtsko checks needed?

Alexey Ivanovich, what questions do schools ask most often?
- Despite the fact that this form of work has existed in Moscow for three years and we constantly provide explanations on this procedure, we continue to receive various questions regarding the organization and content of external independent diagnostics.
- Then the first question will be: why does the school need to participate in diagnostics?
- Each school has an internal monitoring system for the quality of education. Assessing students' educational achievements is the most important part of this process. If such monitoring is focused only on the use of internal materials (tests, dictations) prepared by school teachers, then teaching staff a subjective picture of assessing educational achievements may emerge. In addition, in this case there is no opportunity to compare the successes of one’s own students with the achievements of students of other students. educational organizations. Thus, participation in independent diagnostics of educational achievements allows schools to receive objective information about the quality of education, compare the results of their students with the results in the city or district, get acquainted with the achievements of the best educational organizations and focus on them. Analysis of errors and shortcomings based on the results of each diagnostic allows you to timely adjust the learning process to achieve better results in the future.
- How many parallel classes should participate in independent diagnostics and who determines this?
- The school itself decides which diagnostics to sign up for and how many classes will take part in it. Since all diagnostics are carried out according to the annual plan, the school administration has the opportunity even before the start academic year familiarize yourself with the list of activities and include the selected diagnostics in the plan for internal monitoring of the quality of education. Of course, there are extremes here. Some schools strive to obtain the best results in independent diagnostics and always present one at all events. best class in parallel. Others are trying to transfer all internal monitoring onto the rails of independent diagnostics and apply for each diagnostic all classes of a given parallel at once. Of course, you should not adhere to these extremes, because, for example, in the first case, the main goal of independent diagnostics is not achieved - the school administration obtaining objective information about educational results. In addition, the schedule of independent diagnostics is such that two events can be held on one day for the same class, for example, in September of this academic year, diagnostics in Russian language and mathematics for the 7th grade were carried out on September 18, and for the 9th grade. 1st grade - September 25. It is clear that one class cannot take part in two events at once on one day, therefore, at each stage, within one direction of diagnostics (subject or meta-subject), only one class can be entered. In the second case, when the entire parallel (for example, ten classes) is applied for diagnostics at once, the event becomes extremely costly, because 10 independent observers must come to the school; this is hardly advisable. Since options diagnostic work leave at school, it is better to apply for an independent diagnosis of grades 1-2, and then conduct diagnostics on your own using the same materials in other grades.
- The decision on diagnostics is made by the school, but is it necessary to obtain parental consent to participate in the diagnostics?
- As a rule, independent diagnostics of educational achievements is the same assessment exercise as a test or essay, which is usually carried out by a teacher. In this case, parental consent, as for regular testing, is not necessary. However, in Moscow every year a comprehensive diagnosis of educational achievements in primary schools is carried out, which involves surveying children and parents. A variety of personal data is used here, we're talking about not only about educational achievements, but also about various individual characteristics students. For a child to participate in such complex diagnostics Parental consent must be obtained.
- What happens when the administration is interested in objective information about educational results, but does not want bad results to become known outside the school walls?
- In Moscow, they are implementing not only the principle of voluntary participation in independent diagnostics, but also the opportunity for schools to independently make decisions about storing diagnostic results in the citywide information network (Moscow Register of Education Quality - MRKO). Within two weeks after the diagnostic results are posted in the MRKO, the administration of the educational organization can analyze the data obtained, using the explanations and recommendations of MCKO specialists, which are posted on the MRKO websites (in personal accounts) and MRKO, and based on the analysis, decide which results to save in the school’s portfolio . Such a system allows the school to check weak classes without the risk of “exposing” poor results. However, it is worth recalling that if within two weeks a decision was not made not to include the result in the MRKO, then the results are automatically saved. Sometimes the administration selects for independent diagnostics those classes in which teachers teaching this subject plan to undergo certification in the near future. Undoubtedly, this is a very important area, especially since the results saved by the school are automatically included in the teachers’ portfolios, and therefore will be taken into account in future certification.
- When registering for diagnostics, MCCO requests additional information, for example: names and surnames of students, their grades for the last stage of intermediate certification, textbooks used in this class. Is it necessary to enter this data into the MRKO?
- Regarding the first part of the question, without a list of students, the Moscow Center for Education and Science will not be able to post the diagnostic results in the students’ personal accounts, which means their parents will not have access to this information. True, such a need will soon disappear, since MRKO is an information and analytical system of the Department of Education. In this regard, the integration of MRKO has already taken place with the registry of educational institutions, and integration with the “Contingent” registry is planned. Therefore, in the near future there will be no need to fill out students’ personal names when applying for diagnostics: they will be entered into the system automatically.
Marks for intermediate certification allow you to assess the correspondence of diagnostic results to school grades. Correlation of test results with school grades allows us to assess the reliability of measuring materials; MCKO constantly monitors this indicator of test quality. On the other hand, discrepancies of 2 or more points between the diagnostic results and the school grade signal the teacher and school administration about the discrepancy between the internal school assessment and the objective test results.
As for the data on the textbooks used, the ICDC conducts an analysis for all diagnostic participants as a whole. Correlation analysis also provides an opportunity to look at differences in study results individual topics or formation individual species activities during the work of schools using different educational and methodological packages. This makes it possible to identify the advantages and disadvantages of certain educational and methodological sets (TMS) and ultimately makes the choice of TMS by teachers more meaningful.
- In what cases can school results be considered unreliable?
- The results of an independent diagnosis of a school (or a specific class) may be considered unreliable; we take into account two factors:
analysis of student answer forms;
analysis of feedback from independent observers on compliance with testing technology.
Class results are considered unreliable if answers to several assignments have been corrected in most forms. In addition, we use a special program that analyzes the frequency of identical incorrect answers in the class and thus records cheating. At the same time, we must take into account the comments made by the independent observer in the observation report: poor discipline, tips from students, non-compliance with testing technology.
- If the day for the diagnosis, which is indicated in the MCCO plan, is not suitable for the school, can it order it to be carried out on another day?
- Independent diagnostics are not a free pleasure. If the diagnostics takes place, for example, on October 2, then after it is carried out, the work options are considered open and you can prepare to work with these options, as happened with the Unified State Exam KIM options that turned out to be on the eve of the exams on the Internet. Accordingly, the next day, diagnostics with an independent observer must be carried out using new materials, which leads to additional costs budget funds. Therefore, it is better to either review the schedule of your events and take part in an independent diagnosis on the scheduled day, or conduct it in internal monitoring mode on another day.
- If a school uses a different program in a subject and the proposed diagnostics do not suit it, can it order diagnostics with different content?
- As a rule, subject diagnostics, which are carried out during the academic year, are focused on the programs of the most common educational and methodological kits in the city. In accordance with the instructions of the Department of Education, MCKO prepares one set of options for each diagnosis. If a school wants to receive individual measuring materials, it can order them from its own financial resources.
- Who at school decides on the participation of classes in diagnostics?
- In most schools, the plan for internal monitoring of the quality of education and participation in external diagnostic activities is discussed at teacher councils, and approved by the school director. Based on this plan, the administrator responsible for work at MRKO nominates classes to participate in external diagnostics.
- How should the administration work with a teacher if his class has been submitted for independent diagnostics?
- Before conducting diagnostics, you need to ensure that the teacher promptly familiarizes himself with the specification, codifier and demo version. Let me remind you that these documents are posted on the MCCO website a month before the scheduled day of diagnosis. The next important aspect is preparing students for the test form. Here you need to study the instructional materials, which are also posted on the website, and familiarize students in advance with the rules for formatting forms and the features of recording answers to assignments various types. After receiving the diagnostic results, they are automatically uploaded to the schools’ classrooms in MRKO, after which it is necessary to record the detected problems, ensure that all unmastered content elements or skills are organized correctional work. Since all the results are also placed in the students’ personal accounts, it is desirable that corrective measures ( additional tasks, consultation schedule) were also reflected there, so that parents could see how successfully their child was filling the identified gaps. In addition to the instructional and methodological materials posted on the MCKO website in the “Monitoring and Diagnostics” section, materials from webinars regularly held by the MCKO can help at the stages of preparation and analysis of results (see the webinar schedule http://mcko.ru/webinar/) . During the webinars, they discuss issues related to the content of diagnostic work, the procedure for testing, and analyze the generalized diagnostic results. By directly participating in the webinar, schools and teachers can ask questions that interest them, share their experiences, and by downloading recordings of past webinars, use the materials for methodological meetings with teachers.
- Let’s assume that after the diagnostics, the schools received the results for the class. How to determine whether they received a high or low result?
- In the recommendations of the MCCS, which are posted in the offices of schools in the MRCS simultaneously with the results, there is information about overall results by city and explanations for interpreting the results of classes (schools). Among the indicators that the class participating in the diagnostics receives is an indicator called the “performance coefficient”. It is determined by the formula: Ri = Xi / Xavg., where Xi is the result of diagnostic work performed by students of this class, Xavg. - the result of the work performed on average for all OUs participating in such diagnostics. The performance coefficient Ri = 1 is the average result of performing diagnostic work as a whole for all educational organizations that participated in the diagnostics. A value of Ri >1 means that the class results exceed the city average; performance coefficients exceeding 1.2 are considered the most significant. Ri values< 1 говорят о более низких результатах, чем в среднем по городу, а критическими показателями здесь будут коэффициенты менее 0,8. Кроме этого, необходимо сравнить результаты выполнения по контролируемым элементам содержания или видам деятельности, сравнив их с общегородскими показателями.
- What diagnostics does MCCS offer for schools making the transition to second-generation standards?
- System diagnostic measures MCKO assumes the use of measuring materials in accordance with the federal component of the state educational standard, and in accordance with the Federal State Educational Standard. If only subject tests are developed for the standards of the previous generation, then to accompany the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard, schools are offered both subject and meta-subject measurement materials. Activities are planned for grades 1-4 this school year. primary school, 5-6th grades of the basic school and for 10th grades participating in the pilot project for the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard. Here we offer both independent diagnostic procedures and wide range measuring materials for internal monitoring of educational achievements in schools implementing the Federal State Educational Standard. For evaluation meta-subject results we offer measuring materials in five various directions: diagnostics of cognitive meta-subject skills, interdisciplinary concepts, reading literacy, problem-solving competence and diagnostics of communicative and regulatory skills within the framework of observations project activities students. At the beginning of the school year, we publish an order of the Department of Education on the MCED website, which indicates not only the name and dates of each diagnostic, but also to assess the requirements of which standard the event is aimed at.

Information for your information

The Federal Service for Intellectual Property has registered the city of Moscow as the copyright holder of the information and analytical system “Moscow Register of Education Quality” (IAS MRKO), on behalf of which the Department of Education acts (certificate No. 2013661983 dated December 20, 2013).


MCKO is classified as an autonomous local institution that checks the level of vocational education in the capital. The structure was formed in 2004, at the insistence of State Duma officials.

The organization pursues certain goals, in particular, inspection and diagnosis of educational institutions. MCCO will conduct monitoring and diagnostics in 2018-2019. After all, it is important to expand current tasks theoretically and practically in order to increase the level of quality of students’ knowledge and also to reveal their existing abilities. Additionally, specialists are selected who undergo advanced training. In addition, representatives of the organization prepare and then implement monitoring studies.

At the peak of popularity are events that are rational for diagnosing the work of educational institutions. This allows us to focus on the development of secondary schools and other institutions that operate in the capital. Thanks to such a system, officials can make informed decisions on the implementation of educational reforms; students receive optimal knowledge and skills, which in the future will allow them to develop their own professionalism.

Why are such checks needed?

The Moscow Center annually organizes a lot of inspections of educational institutions, and all because it is important to monitor the effectiveness of the educational system, simultaneously identifying shortcomings in the educational process.

Best result demonstrate independent diagnostics, they are also in unprecedented demand. In any of the schools, internal monitoring of the educational process has been formed; various tasks are prepared by teachers, who then conduct an inspection. As a result, a subjective assessment is formed, which sometimes differs from the actual situation.

Independent assessment, as an excellent basis for considering the objective situation on at the moment, you can compare the successes of schoolchildren with children from other educational institutions. When analyzing errors, it is quite possible to quickly and timely adjust the educational process, correcting shortcomings. The school management independently decides which diagnostics are rational at the moment, and the number of classes that will take part. The administration has the opportunity to pre-agreed the time, because diagnostics are carried out according to the annual plan.

It’s a pity, but it happens that schools present only 1, the leading class, for diagnostics. That is, they try to show the educational institution with the highest possible results. But, in no case should we forget that diagnostics are not classified as competitions; we are talking about a tool that allows us to improve the quality of the learning process. First and foremost, such checks are rational for schools, not the Ministry of Education.

In addition, there is a chance that the data in the school portfolio will not be saved. Over the course of 2 weeks, the management of the institution analyzes the result and can submit a request to the MCCS so that the results are not saved. This chance is extremely important for teachers who, in the potential future, are preparing for certification for a higher category, and this takes into account the performance of the class where they teach.

Parents can look at personal account information about the subject for which the diagnosis will be carried out, its timing. As a result, the child will be able to prepare well.

How is the audit usually carried out?

Carrying out diagnostics is considered paid service, accordingly, if suddenly on the appointed day of inspection the school refuses, then you will have to pay money again for a repeat action. First of all, we must not forget that diagnostic data is published on the official portal of the Moscow Center for Clinical Assessment, 1 month before its start, and a demo version is also available there. The teacher is recommended to review the proposed materials in advance and then begin preparing the class. Important point– filling out answer forms. Indeed, all students must understand how to fill out the form before the test takes place.

This is a serious moment, because you shouldn’t make stupid mistakes. The portal contains instructions teaching materials, open to teachers and children, as well as webinars, the schedules of which are presented in the corresponding section. Webinars help because, in addition to receiving official data, you will be able to ask questions in online mode, and find out constructive answers to them. As soon as the check is completed, the result will appear in the school’s personal account, it can be rationally analyzed, and advice can be given to the teacher.

Sometimes the results are considered unreliable, suddenly violations were identified during the test, or there are a colossal number of corrections in the answer form!

The new academic season 2018-2019 will again not be complete without independent monitoring and diagnostics of MTsKO in metropolitan schools. So government agency additional professional education in Moscow has the opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching, draw conclusions about the quality of knowledge received by schoolchildren, identify the most capable teachers, prepare the ground for the introduction of new educational systems, and this is not the entire list of tasks that can be solved with the help of these checks.

Monitoring 2018-2019

All audit activity institutions were divided into three large groups:

  1. Assessment of educational achievements of students in educational organizations in the 2018/2019 academic year (on a budgetary and extra-budgetary basis).
  2. National surveys on the quality of knowledge delivery.
  3. International comparative quality studies educational process.

Each group differs in the MCCO diagnostic calendar 2018-2019, as well as goals, participants and verification tools. But they have a common regulatory document - a letter from the Moscow Department of Education dated May 14, 2018 “On measures to independent assessment educational achievements of students of educational organizations in the 2018/2019 academic year.”

Inspection Plan for Secondary Schools

This is the most popular plan among teachers and directors, as it applies to all budgetary educational institutions in the capital. In the new academic year it will consist of seven stages:

  • Corrective mandatory diagnostics from grades 9 to 11. Will only affect those establishments where Unified State Exam result in Russian language and mathematics in 2018 was unsatisfactory.

  • Testing in those subjects that are studied at an in-depth level.

  • Inspections in organizations participating in the project to organize specialized training in basic general education programs.

  • Testing knowledge acquired in elective classes. For 8-9 grades this is “financial literacy” or “history of Moscow”, and for tenth graders this is “memorable pages of the history of the Fatherland”.
  • Meta-subject diagnostics. Serves for analysis of achieving planned results in mastering the educational program.
  • Diagnostics in primary school(mathematics, Russian language, reading). Will take place in April 2019.

Important! First stage diagnostics will pass in September – November 2018. Applications for participation in it must be submitted on the website mrko.mos.ru in the school’s personal account. Also on the official website of the institution in the section “instructional and methodological materials” you can familiarize yourself with complete information for conducting an audit.

In the current academic year, the Moscow Educational Center will also conduct raids on educational institutions that are not budget-funded (private schools). The MCCO 2018-2019 audit schedule for them is shown below.

National Education Quality Surveys

This group includes two diagnostic tools. These are the All-Russian testing works (VPR) and the program of National Research on the Quality of Education (NIKO).

The purpose of these methods is to ensure unity educational space with universal compliance with accepted general education programs.

The features of VPR are:

  • the level of testing of schoolchildren’s knowledge is carried out through the same task for the entire country;
  • are used common criteria assessment;
  • schoolchildren are provided with absolutely identical conditions when taking the exam (reflected in special instructions);
  • unified assessment criteria (after completing the work, schools gain access to assessment criteria and recommendations).

VPRs provide an opportunity for school leaders to timely navigate the correct organization of the educational process and check the level of knowledge of their students for compliance with the all-Russian standard.

Important! While writing such tests, the presence of observers from parents or teachers is allowed.

Features of the NIKO program are:

  • anonymous questioning (computer testing technology or the use of machine-readable forms) of students in order to collect information about the learning process and its proper level;
  • the selection of participants is carried out at the federal level according to special technique(depends on the specific NIKO project).
  • the results of the surveys received are used for analysis current state educational system and the formation of programs for its development.

Important! When testing students under the NIKO program, assessing the performance of teachers and regional authorities executive branch not provided.

Participation in the new academic year in the NIKO project is shown below.

International comparative studies of education quality

In 2018-2019, this monitoring group will be marked by three events, each of which is aimed at different categories schoolchildren.

  1. Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (quality of reading and text comprehension). Will be conducted among students primary classes V different countries peace.
  2. International Computer and Information Literacy Study (testing computer and information literacy for eighth graders).
  3. Research on civics education for eighth graders.

Non-diagnostic goals of MCCO in 2018-2019

In addition to monitoring educational institutions, the Moscow Education Center has many other goals and plans in the field of improving the level of education in Moscow and, in particular, in Russia. These are various international conferences, seminars and certifications.

So, the very first thing in the calendar of the new academic year is planned important event world-class – Moscow International Forum “City of Education” (August 30 – September 2, 2018). The organizers plan to attract more than 70,000 participants, among whom will be representatives of the leadership of schools in Moscow, Russia and other countries of the world. The forum will end with a traditional Russian language festival.

And in February the main organizational event of the year will take place - an international conference on the development of a quality system for acquiring knowledge.

The center also offers advanced training courses for employees of educational organizations with the issuance of an appropriate certificate.

WITH detailed schedule Diagnostic work 2018 – 2019 can be found by everyone on the MCKO website mcko.ru.

On September 26, Kommersant Publishing House held a conference “Technologies in Education,” where Pavel Kuzmin, director of the Moscow Center for Quality Education, spoke about the role information technology for quality growth mass education based on the experience of Moscow.

Among the participants are representatives of universities, commercial companies, heads of relevant departments, journalists. At the event, issues of transformation and trends in education, the pros and cons of online education, public-private partnerships, etc. were discussed.

Of particular interest was the topic of informatization of preschool, secondary and higher education, in which the experience of Moscow was presented. “Since 2010, the Moscow Government has been actively introducing new technologies into education and supplying the most modern educational equipment. An IT infrastructure has been created in every school, and almost every Moscow school has access to the key capital project “Moscow e-school" More than 150 Moscow schools are equipped with modern medical and engineering equipment as part of pre-professional education. These are the services and platforms that, according to international research agencies, have no analogues in the world. No other metropolis in the world has created such a unified electronic educational environment,” said Pavel Kuzmin, director of the Moscow Center for Quality Education. Massive quality education requires quality products that must be high level from a meaningful point of view and have a convenient and understandable interface. “Why is MES strong? The basis of MES is the most serious, high-quality content made by Moscow teachers with serious external expertise. Sometimes I see the most beautiful product, the most beautiful packaging, but the content is completely empty. There are interesting solutions, but they are either for converting two-star students to three-year students, i.e., the tasks are quite elementary, or vice versa - for very gifted creative children. Electronic solutions that can be used for 100 thousand children are very important to us. And not alone unique product with one solution. It should be variable, adapt to the child, give him the opportunity to move along different educational trajectories. Such a system, in principle, is implemented in one way or another at MES, but we are also looking for new solutions from partners,” emphasized Pavel Kuzmin.

According to him, there are a number of very important promising directions, in particular, electronic knowledge diagnostics, diagnostics with elements of virtual and augmented reality. Last year, at the international educational exhibition BETT in London, Moscow presented the world's first virtual diagnostics in physics, chemistry, astronomy and stereometry in VR format.

At the conference it was also noted that the introduction of new technologies resulted in an increase in the level of education in schools, as evidenced by the results of international studies of the quality of education PISA and PIRLS, in which Moscow occupies a leading position. “Day migration has become significantly less. After all, electronic technologies have made it possible for almost every Moscow school to provide high-quality education. As a result - high density results of Moscow schoolchildren in international studies,” said Pavel Kuzmin.

For last year Experts from more than 70 regions of Russia came to study Moscow’s experience in the field of education. Interest in Moscow and education is growing, as evidenced by the record attendance at the Moscow International Forum “City of Education”, which this year attracted more than 133 thousand visitors over 4 days of work.

The final work in the education system can be considered three types:

  • administrative control and verification work;
  • diagnostic and tests, monitoring MCKO;
  • final final exams.

Both have the same goals.

Firstly, the final work is designed to check the state of the quality of education in educational institutions.

Secondly, thanks to them, the actual level of students’ knowledge in certain subjects, their theoretical knowledge and practical skills is revealed.

And, thirdly, the final work is aimed at monitoring the implementation of educational programs and calendar and thematic planning in educational institutions.

On the official website of the Moscow Center for Quality Education you can find all up-to-date information in the sections concerning monitoring and diagnostics.


Organization and conduct of administrative control and verification work in educational institutions

The final work must be carried out strictly according to the schedule approved by the school director.

They are taught in all subjects, with the exception of music, fine arts, world artistic culture, physical education and fundamentals religious cultures and secular ethics.

The subject teacher decides what tasks will be in the work, but coordination with the deputy director for educational work is mandatory.

During the test, in addition to the subject teacher, there is an assistant of the same specialty or from the administration.

Students write their work on special stamped sheets. The assignment time is one lesson.

All work is handed over upon call, no one has the right to delay. If one of the students did not have time to write, such an assignment will be considered uncompleted.

The teacher and assistant must check the work within one day. Grades are given according to the requirements.

Diagnostic and control work, monitoring of MCKO

These types of checks must be planned in advance. Teachers and students must be notified no later than two weeks before the event.

Test works are checked by subject teachers within three days, and monitoring studies are analyzed at the center of the Moscow Center for Educational Education.

Educational institutions are obliged not to interfere with the conduct of such verifications, but, on the contrary, to facilitate in every possible way and organize them with the highest possible quality.

The results are discussed at pedagogical councils, information and recommendations are provided for further effective work.

Works are assessed according to the system the school uses. This assessment influences the final score for the intermediate assessment.

These types of checks make it possible to most objectively check the quality of students’ knowledge and the effectiveness of the delivery of knowledge by subject teachers. Schools can apply for independent diagnostics themselves.

Final final exams

Detailed information about this type of final work is presented on the official website of the Regional Information Processing Center of the city of Moscow.

Official website Regional center Moscow information processing – main page On this site you can find all regulatory framework exams, schedule, results, practice tasks, current news, information on filing appeals. All information is reliable and up-to-date.

Today there are four types of final final exams:

  • Final essay
  • GIA, OGE and Unified State Exam
  • Final essay

The final essay can be assigned to 11th grade students. If they participate in the State Academic Examination in individual subjects - Russian language or mathematics, then an essay at the end of 10th grade is not assigned.

The results of the final essay can be accepted as admission to the State Examination Institute or for admission to educational institutions higher education. It is carried out in those schools where graduates are directly trained.

  • GIA, OGE and Unified State Exam

State final certification – general concept for the OGE and the Unified State Exam. In some sources you can find - GIA-9 (this is the OGE) and GIA-11 (this is the Unified State Exam). As the names suggest, these are final final exams for grades 9 and 11, respectively.

Pupils who do not have academic debt and have completed their studies in full are allowed to take the final certification curriculum. Grades in subjects must be at least “satisfactory”.

OGE or GIA-9 is the main state exam taken by schoolchildren completing the ninth grade. They are required to pass four subjects.

Without passing them, they will not receive a certificate, which means they will not be able to enter secondary technical educational institutions or transfer to the tenth grade.

The subjects required to pass are Russian language and mathematics, and the other two are at the choice of the student.

The rating must be no lower than “satisfactory”, that is, “3”. The grade on this exam affects the grade on the certificate.


The Unified State Exam or GIA-11 is an exam taken by eleventh grade graduates. It is called unified because its results are included both for assessment at school for the certificate and for assessment at entrance examinations in higher education institutions.

Knowledge on the Unified State Exam is tested from the fifth to the eleventh grade, so they can overlap with tasks in the Unified State Exam.

Schoolchildren also take four subjects, of which Russian language and mathematics are compulsory, and the other two are optional (physics, chemistry, biology, literature, geography, history, social studies, foreign language– English, French, Spanish, German, computer science and information and communication technologies).

Most often, graduates choose those subjects that they need to enter higher education. educational institutions to reduce your time and not take them extra. If you do not achieve the minimum scores, the student does not receive a certificate, but graduates from school with a certificate.

The Unified State Examination is conducted on the territory of a school other than the one in which the students are directly taught, and by teachers from this school.

Moreover, the exam is conducted under cameras to eliminate any kind of violations both on the part of students and on the part of the organizers.

Eat strict list those items that you can take with you to class. Help from teachers is strictly prohibited.

Participants in the examination process will see all tasks for the first time in the first minutes of testing.

The teacher opens the package with them in front of the schoolchildren. Unlike the OGE, grades here are given in a hundred-point system, where one hundred is the maximum score.

This exam is conducted throughout the country at the same time on the same day. Any “leaks” of information are strictly excluded; all of it is strictly classified. Students must submit applications to participate in the Unified State Exam in selected subjects before March 1 of the current year.

Once all applications have been submitted, an examination schedule will be drawn up.

The tasks are complexes of a standardized form, including test tasks and detailed written questions.

Students may be exempt from passing the Unified State Exam or OGE in a specific subject, if they are winners or prize-winners of All-Russian Olympiads, members of Russian national teams participating in international Olympiads.

Additionally, it is possible to take exams on other days if the pass was due to good reason, meeting the requirements, or on one day on the schedule two subjects that were chosen by one student. For such cases, additional certification days are assigned.

If a student does not agree with the grade assigned, he can file an appeal within the established time frame.

In such cases, a hearing will be scheduled at which the student, together with his teacher, will defend his opinion and, possibly, receive additional points.

All requirements for carrying out any kind of final work and testing comply with the requirements of the state educational standard at the federal level and are documented in orders and resolutions. Their implementation is strictly controlled.

Such a system for assessing students makes it possible to objectively and qualitatively test their knowledge and, accordingly, the effectiveness of school institutions.